首页> 外文OA文献 >4-year clinical outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents: a report from the RESOLUTE All-Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
【2h】

4-year clinical outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents: a report from the RESOLUTE All-Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)

机译:新一代药物洗脱支架治疗的患者的4年临床结果和重复血运重建的预测指标:RESOLUTE All-Comers试验报告(Zotarolimus洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉支架的随机比较)介入)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES\ud\udThe aim of the study was to investigate 4-year outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) and XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois) in the RESOLUTE (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) All-Comers trial.\ud\udBACKGROUND\ud\udData on long-term outcomes of new-generation drug-eluting stents are limited, and predictors of repeat revascularization due to restenosis and/or progression of disease are largely unknown.\ud\udMETHODS\ud\udPatients were randomly assigned to treatment with the R-ZES (n = 1,140) or the EES (n = 1,152). We assessed pre-specified safety and efficacy outcomes at 4 years including target lesion failure and stent thrombosis. Predictors of revascularization at 4 years were identified by Cox regression analysis.\ud\udRESULTS\ud\udAt 4 years, the rates of target lesion failure (15.2% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.68), cardiac death (5.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.44), and target vessel myocardial infarction (5.3% vs. 5.4%, p = 1.00), clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.62), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.3% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.23) were similar with the R-ZES and EES. Independent predictors of TLR were age, insulin-treated diabetes, SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, treatment of saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, and in-stent restenosis. Independent predictors of any revascularization were age, diabetes, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, absence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, smaller reference vessel diameter, SYNTAX score, and treatment of left anterior descending, right coronary artery, saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, or in-stent restenosis.\ud\udCONCLUSIONS\ud\udR-ZES and EES demonstrated similar safety and efficacy throughout 4 years. TLR represented less than one-half of all repeat revascularization procedures. Patient- and lesion-related factors predicting the risk of TLR and any revascularization showed considerable overlap. (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084).
机译:目的\ ud \ ud本研究的目的是研究经Resolute佐他莫司洗脱支架(R-ZES)(Medtronic,Minneapolis,明尼苏达州)和XIENCE V依维莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者的4年结果和重复血运重建的预测因素(EES)(伊利诺伊州雅培公园的Abbott Vascular)在RESOLUTE(佐他莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的随机比较)All-Comers试验。\ ud \ udBACKGROUND \ ud \ ud新一代药物洗脱支架的长期结果是有限的,并且由于再狭窄和/或疾病进展而导致的再次血运重建的预测因素尚不清楚。\ ud \ udMETHODS \ ud \ ud患者被随机分配至接受R- ZES(n = 1,140)或EES(n = 1,152)。我们评估了4年时预先指定的安全性和疗效结果,包括目标病变失败和支架血栓形成。通过Cox回归分析确定了4年时血运重建的预测指标。\ ud \ udRESULTS \ ud \ ud4年时,目标病变失败率(15.2%比14.6%,p = 0.68),心源性死亡(5.4%vs. 5.4%)。 4.7%,p = 0.44)和目标血管心肌梗塞(5.3%vs. 5.4%,p = 1.00),临床指示的靶病变血运重建术(TLR)(7.0%vs. 6.5%,p = 0.62),并且是确定的可能的支架血栓形成(2.3%vs. 1.6%,p = 0.23)与R-ZES和EES相似。 TLR的独立预测因素是年龄,接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病,SYNTAX(PCI与紫杉和心脏外科手术之间的协同作用)评分,大隐静脉移植物治疗,眼部病变和支架内再狭窄。任何血运重建的独立预测因素是年龄,糖尿病,先前的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,无ST段抬高的心肌梗死,较小的参考血管直径,SYNTAX评分以及左前降支,右冠状动脉,大隐静脉移植物,眼部病变, \ ud \ ud结论\ ud \ udR-ZES和EES在整个4年中显示出相似的安全性和有效性。 TLR占所有重复血运重建程序的不到一半。与患者和病变相关的因素可预测TLR的风险以及任何血运重建均存在相当大的重叠。 (Zotarolimus洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的随机比较[RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号